If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.
by fuzoid » Wed Sep 26, 2012 2:39 pm
chris owens wrote:I think all you deniers are scared of the facts and dont want to know the truth....or are government shills to prevent mass panic
the orbit I was taught in scholl showed the planets orbiting at the center of the sun....not trailing behind it, like they do...and was taught that they rotated on the galactic plane.
since I have been studying this for the past 10 years, my science only gets better
and fuzoid...not your real name
.....the planets do follow the sun through the galaxy, what would make you say they dont
another ...our suns binary twin may have exited....but just for 3600 years...have you been alive that long...didnt think sowhats to say it wont show up again
so I say if people want to know whats going on, they should listen to people like me that independently research this stuff and not just regurgitating what they have been taught...
I get my thoughts from all kinds of different sources and then come to my own conclusions as to what is actually happening
so what makes you an expert
by chris owens » Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:33 am
by fuzoid » Thu Sep 06, 2012 8:47 pm
chris owens wrote:if I may say....the reason we cant see it is the same reason we cant see anything real good beyond the sun....because the sun bends light.
second....most conventional thinkers see the earth in one mindset, to see what is going on in our solar system, we must also think galactically.
now for class...... our solar ecliptic is an angle to the galactic ecliptic, and thought to be moving in a counter clockwise direction within the galaxy. Given that....we now know that the planets are not on a flat ecliptic with the sun, as they are being dragged along behind the sun, the bigger they are the harder they are to drag given all the gravitational forces at work. now sometimes these planets may have the slinky effect...closer or farther away from the sun...(galactic gravitational forces at work)
so you have a bunch of planets following a star (sun) around the galaxy
........whats to say that our star(sun) doesnt have a binary twin....most other stars do... they usually orbit each other.
OK lets move on.....now whats to say that our stars binary twin doesnt have planets with it, could be possible...and if they are orbiting their star at the opposite angle ....could happen........then that would mean that it would only be seen from the southern pole of our earth...when it gets close enough.
now if you've ever seen two ball magnets in a vacuum roll towards each other , its slow at first, then they speed up....hmmm so very soon we may start seeing these objects
2012 could be the start of us seeing , because the Mayans were star watchers, they may have done their celestial calender up to the date it would first be seen again
now sit back...take all tht in and the reply....not tommorrow...not in two weeks....give it a month to sink in
by Halter » Wed Sep 05, 2012 7:26 am
by chris owens » Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:03 pm
by chris owens » Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:19 am
by highdude7449 » Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:07 pm
by WendyW » Sat Mar 31, 2012 11:30 pm
by thanksnoplanetx » Tue Jan 03, 2012 12:47 am
by engineerretired » Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:29 pm
jsdorset wrote:kepler 20e and 20f. But could these be part of the Nibiru system?